Black Friday, the day lots of people busy with the holiday shopping and deals day, I was one of them. And I felt happy until this afternoon I found out that the store Fry’s receipt showed some extra charge. I guess this is again
1. To give the bad ideas
2. For the purpose of letting other people know I bought these three items.
What happened was the following, and I think this might have something to do with my previous next door neighbor Bo the tennis boy or Ping Zhang 54 years old ice lady.
I bought 3 items from this Fry’s store this afternoon at around 12:20pm. #1 was the legal education quick learn (4.95$), # 2 was the photoshop stuff quick learn (5.95$), in order to figure out how my previous next door neighbor boy might have done to the vedios editing stuff, # 3 was a stack of print out paper (7.99$), I didn’t buy the security software, because I was worried I can’t get the rebate check from the mail, under the disturb behaviors of somebody such as my previous next door neighbor Bo the tennis player boy, and the Ping Zhang 54 years old ice lady. Anyway, after getting home, I noticed that the cashier Machell Couch lady overcharged me an extra stack of paper for 7.99$, but didn’t charge me the photo shop item of 5.95$, therefore, my receipt looked like the following at time of 12:20pm on this black Friday afternoon, I was over charged $2 overall speaking.
Paper $7.99
Paper #2 is 7.99$, although I only bought one stack.
Legal education sheet for 4.95$ (note: no photo shop sheet charge)
Machell always means Machell Quanan the ice skater athelet to me, therefore, I consider this cashier lady may imply ping Zhang 54 years old ice lady. She told me the computer was down at the time I checked out.
I think this incidence was not a simple mistake. It might have some considerations in here:
1. To give the idea of the ice lady can be framed into the couch lady, although which is not the case for the couch thing=Ping Zhang 54 years old ice lady can be switched to me. Ping Zhang 54 years old might did it.
2. Also to give the idea of double charging items, for example, double charge eggs, but eliminate the pancake mix from my grocery receipts, the overall effect was over charge.
3. To inform the technology person on the criminal side that my paper could be pretreated so that whatever printed on those paper could have been under watched, therefore, be careful.
4. I grabbed the legal education sheet and read before I checked out, and notice that it had some interesting point, I am not going to tell you yet. Therefore, in order to let other people get realized what I got, this Ping Zhang 54 years old lady or the Bo Yang tennis previous next door neighbor boy had down that to me, they worried. They didn’t know what was the entire sheet were talking about, section by section could be different in terms of the favor or not favor. I smelled something already, which I don’t think it’s fair, such as “ self serving reports prepared in anticipation of litigation are inadmissible”, which I think it could be a bullshit untruthful law, for example my blog posts should be a strong evidence source to help investigate and to draw certain conclusion. All the facts I provided such as the “shit smell in my master bedroom created by Bo tennis player my previous next door neighbor due to the inability to watch after 7/13/2005 external biopsy procedure” stories are very valuable to draw the important conclusion such as Bo Yang my previous next door neighbor couldn’t really see anything after 7/13/2005, but he might rumor the “gauze in my breast thing” to be against my husband k was a set up. Also, the " 2008 after famous sleeping bug syndrom experience" facts, and all the police grabbing experiences were all valuable evidences to prove points. And I had 185 posts already, how could those be “self serving”?? I was writing based on the past experiences, how could that be thought as” inadmissible”?? All the blog posts writing should be admissible, instead of “inadmissible”, right?????
5. The first minute I thought this Fry’s store was such a top quality store, even better than best buy in my personal opinions, and just randomly related it to the KFC chicken fastfood restaurant, ( old man = chicken year birthday lady Ping Zhang 54 years old, . I and ping Zhang 54 years old ice lady are both in Chicken year birthday, she is 12 years older. ) The next minute somebody created this over charge drama for me to go back to fight, and I behaved very furious, although maybe under the remote control of those Ping Zhang 54 years old ice lady or my previous next door neighbor Bo the tennis boy. And that means I am challenging the store I liked a lot and plan to go in the future a lot. See, from this incidence, you can also see how different interpretation or purposes for different people to plan and to hold position with.
6. I went back to the store to get my money back. The store manager Adam Hales didn’t say “sorry” at all but kept saying that “You didn’t pay for the photoshop” education sheet” at the beginning, therefore, for the people who didn’t know what was going on might think that It was my fault, but actually, it was the Mechell lady’s fault or my previous next door neighbor Bo tennis Boy’s fault for double charging me of 7.99 $, but not charging me for 5.99$, therefore, they owe me 2$. And when I asked for the cash, Adam wouldn’t give me the cash but prefer to run the credit card again, that was when I started to talk about the past credit card fraud done by my previous next door neighbor boy and Ping Zhang 54 years old ice lady, because I don’t want to buy stuff more than one time in the same store. It was all because of the effect of the previous credit card fraud. And at the same time, I became irritated and had hot blushed face which could be under the remote control of the people such as my previous next door neighbor tennis Bo Yang and Ping Zhang 54 years old ice lady. Who worried about the stuff I talked about from this morning??? Must be my previous next door neighbor couple. Then more chance of Bo tennis the neighbor boy did the thing at 12:20pm.
By the way, I did get my 2$ cash back, but,the “legal evidence” education sheet I bought from Fry’s on Black Friday turned out to be a “Bullshit law Rule” sheet:
Example one: It suggested the unavailability of the declarant, such as “the lack of memory of subject matter of the statement”, the dying of the major declarant people such as me and my husband k, etc.
Example two: It suggested to give the declarant such as me or my husband a criminal liability so that we will be trapped into their bad hell.
Example 3: Statement as to past state of mind are generally not admissible, bullshit rule again. For example, the past statement of mind about what happened on the days of those police officers grabbing when I tried to make the mammogram appointments, and these grabbing had something to do with them, not my husband k, because he knew I was fine. Or, I took my daughter to the barbar shop to have a hair cut during the period of Dec 23 to Dec 28, 2009, while my husband and his sister family were in Florida Disney World, somebody made arrangement to give me the “ugly face” in the barbar shop and arranged a tall African American guy to collect the hairs of my daughter, because the reason I took her to the barbar shop at the end of 2009 was because my daughter had really bad fussy hair in 2009 which was due to the poisoning, and the poisoner of my daughter had something to do with my previous next door neighbor the tennis boy. For these past mind activities, if it was considered as “inadmissible”, I don’t know what to say, their reason was the “Danger of memory defects”—Editing of the memory”, see, always too many criminalized editing stuff.
You guys had these criminal people to work things out, you don’t have to worry anymore.
No comments:
Post a Comment